The technological reasons of the project: experiences from the School of Pescara

  • Filippo Angelucci ‘G. d’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara
Keywords: technology of architecture, technological-environmental design, technological culture of design, built environment

Abstract

This contribution, by looking at several experiences from the School of Architecture of Pescara, proposes some reflections regarding three emergent reasons that confirm how important it is that the training of future architects contain technological subjects. The relational reason, the reason of the processes and the performance reason can contribute in defining the multi/inter/transdisciplinary horizons of didactics, which are becoming more and more necessary when tackling the complexities of the habitat; both to bring it in line with the working market’s demand for new competences and to develop abilities to relate on more than one level and in multiple scales and temporal interventions.

Author Biography

Filippo Angelucci, ‘G. d’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara

PhD, he is Researcher of Architectural Technology at the Department of Architecture.
E-mail: filippo.angelucci@unich.it

References

Aldersey-Williams, H. (2011), Periodic Tales – The Curious Lives of the Elements, Penguin Books, London.

Capra, F. (1997), La rete della vita – Una nuova visione della Natura e della Scienza, Rizzoli Editore, Milano.

Chynoweth, P. (2009), “The Built Environment Interdiscipline: A Theoretical Model for Decision Makers in Research and Teaching”, in Structural Survey, vol. 27, issue 4, pp. 301-310.

Emmitt, S. (2012), Architectural Technology, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.

Friedman, Y. (2015), L’architettura di sopravvivenza – Una filosofia della povertà, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.

Garofalo, F. (2016), Cosa è successo all’architettura italiana?, Marsilio, Venezia.

Giallocosta, G. (2006), “L’approccio sistemico nella gestione di fenomenologie interscalari”, in Di Battista, V., Giallocosta, G. and Minati, G. (eds), Architettura e approccio sistemico, Polimetrica, Milano.

Gillies, D. (1998), Intelligenza artificiale e metodo scientifico, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.

Griffiths, R., (2004), “Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines”, in Studies in Higher Education, vol. 29, issue 6, pp. 709-726.

Guazzo, G. (2003), “I molti modi del pensiero progettuale”, in Bertoldini, M. and Zanelli, A. (eds), Tecnica, progetto e scienze umane, CLUP, Milano.

Kristiansen, P. and Rasmussen, R. (2014), Il metodo Lego® Serious Play® per il business, FrancoAngeli, Milano.

Maldonado, T. (1970), La speranza progettuale – Ambiente e società, Einaudi, Torino.

Manzini, A. (2015), Design when Everybody Designs – An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

Morin, E. (2000), La testa ben fatta – Riforma dell’insegnamento e riforma del pensiero, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.

Nardi, G. (2011), Tecnologie dell’Architettura – Storie e cultura, CLUP, Milano.

Ratti, C. (2014), Architettura Open Source – Verso una progettazione aperta, Einaudi, Torino.

Schiaffonati, F. (2017), “Per una centralità della figura dell’architetto”, in EcoWebTown | Journal of Sustainable Design, vol. II, issue 16, pp. 17-23. [Online] Available at: www.ecowebtown.it/n_16/16_03-schiaffonati-it.html [Accessed 18 April 2017].

Spadolini, P. (1988), “Civiltà industriale e nuove relazioni nel territorio”, in Gurrieri, F. (ed.), Pierluigi Spadolini – Umanesimo e tecnologia, Electa, Milano.

Tagliagambe, S. (1998), L’albero flessibile – La cultura della progettualità, Dunod, Milano.

Tucci, F. (2017), “Per un Manifesto della Green Economy verso l’Architettura e la Città del futuro”, in Antonini, E. and Tucci, F. (eds), Architettura, città e territorio verso la Green Economy, Edizioni Ambiente, San Giuliano Milanese.

Vittoria, E. (1975), Argomenti per un corso di tecnologia dell’architettura, Multigrafica Brunetti, Roma.

Knowing how to work through interfaces: Energetic interfaces; Biomass power plant and railway hub interface (drawings by G. Coluccia, 2016)
Published
2018-06-30
How to Cite
Angelucci, F. (2018) “The technological reasons of the project: experiences from the School of Pescara”, AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 3(online), pp. 83-90. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/3122018.
Section
Architecture | Essays & Viewpoint
Share |