Resilience and circularity in sustainable building design. Integrated tools for pre-intervention assessment


  • Paola De Joanna ‘Federico II’ University of Naples (Italy)
  • Elisabetta Bronzino ‘Federico II’ University of Naples (Italy)
  • Virginia Lusi University of L’Aquila (Italy)



resilience, parametric design, ecosystems, built environment, circular economy


The new demands on environmental protection and the energy efficiency of architectural assets open new frontiers to studies for the development of technologies for the control of the building process. The study presented here aims to identify criteria and tools for the control of resilience and circularity factors in construction as moderators of obsolescence processes, capable of stabilizing the construction product in ecosystem growth. The work integrates the results of two ongoing doctoral types of research that address the issue of controlling resilience and circularity in construction as a strategy for reducing environmental impact by identifying specific methodologies for interventions on the built heritage and the digital design process of new buildings.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Metrics Graph

Author Biographies

Paola De Joanna, ‘Federico II’ University of Naples (Italy)

Architect and PhD, she is an Associate Professor of Architecture Technology at the Department of Architecture. She carries out research on the issues of environmental sustainability, and the protection and enhancement of heritage and territorial resources; she is the Scientific Manager of agreements with local and international bodies.

Elisabetta Bronzino, ‘Federico II’ University of Naples (Italy)

Architect and PhD Candidate at the Department of Architecture, carries out research activities related to CITTAM (Interdepartmental Research Centre for the Study and Traditional Techniques of the Mediterranean Area).

Virginia Lusi, University of L’Aquila (Italy)

Architect and PhD Candidate at the Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering. Her studies concern the sustainability of the built environment, with a focus on the evaluation of the circular economy and resilience for building recovery.


Acampa, G., Ordonez Garcia, J., Grasso, M. and Diaz-Lopez, C. (2019), “Progettazione sostenibile – Criteri da integrare al BIM”, in Valori e Valutazioni, vol. 23, pp. 119-128. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

ARUP (2013), City Resilience Index – Understanding and Measuring City Resilience, Rockefeller Foundation. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Azzurro, P. (2016), “La prevenzione degli sprechi dopo la legge 166/2016”, in Ecoscienza, n. 5, pp. 10-13. [Online] Available at: _la_legge_166_2016_ECOSCIENZA_Numero_5_2016_pagg_10_13 [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Circle Economy (2020), Resilience & the Circular Economy – Opportunities and risks. [Online] Available at: %20-%20CJI%20-%20resilience%20-%20297x210mm.pdf [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Ciribini, G. (1978), Introduzione alla tecnologia del design – Metodi e strumenti logici per la progettazione dell’ambiente costruito, FrancoAngeli, Milano.

CSIRO (2007), Urban Resilience – Research Prospectus – A Resilience Alliance Initiative for Transitioning Urban Systems towards Sustainable Futures, Resilience Alliance. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Dall’Ò, G. (ed.) (2016), Leadership in Green Building – I progetti certificati LEED in Italia, Edizioni Ambiente, Milano.

EU BIM Task Group (2017), Handbook for the introduction of Building Information Modelling by the European Public Sector – Strategic action for construction sector performance – Driving value, innovation and growth. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication (2020), Circular Economy Action Plan – For a cleaner and more competitive Europe, Publications Office of the European Union. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 10 October 2022].

European Commission (2017), Level(s) – A guide to Europe’s new reporting framework for sustainable buildings. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Fetting, C. (2020), The European Green Deal, ESDN Report, December 2020, ESDN Office, Vienna. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Gangemi, V. (ed.) (1991), Norma e recupero – Strumenti per la qualificazione dei centri storici in Campania – Gli Aspetti Tecnologici, Liguori Editore, Napoli.

GBC Italia – Green Building Council Italia (2020), Un ambiente costruito sostenibile per l’Italia del futuro – Le proposte di GBC Italia. [Online] Available at: Website.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2022].

Kennedy, S. and Linnenluecke, M. K. (2022), “Circular economy and resilience – A research agenda”, in Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 31, issue 6, pp. 2754-2765. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 10 October 2022].

Martin-Breen, P. and Anderies, J. M. (2011), Resilience – A literature review, Rockefeller Foundation, New York. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 10 October 2022].

Mondini, G. (2016), “Valutazioni integrate per la gestione delle nuove sfide sociali”, in Valori e Valutazioni, vol. 17, pp. 15-17.

Monsù Scolaro, A. (2017), Progettare con l’esistente –Riuso di edifici, componenti e materiali per un processo edilizio circolare, FrancoAngeli, Milano.

Rifkin, J. (2011), La terza rivoluzione industriale, Mondadori, Milano.

Rockefeller Foundation (2019), Resilient Cities, Resilient Lives – Learning from the 100RC Network. [Online] Available at: [accessed 10 October 2022]

Schipper, E. L. F. and Langston, L. (2015), A comparative Overview of Resilience Measurement Frameworks – Analysing Indicators and Approaches, Working paper, 422, Overseas Development Institute, London. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

SGGE – Stati Generali della Green Economy (2017), Verso l’attuazione del Manifesto della Green Economy per l’architettura e l’urbanistica – Obiettivi, ambiti di indirizzo, strategie prioritarie, SUSDEF Pubblicazioni, Roma. [Online] Available at: pdf [Accessed 10 October 2022].

Suárez-Eiroa, B., Fernández, E. and Méndez, G. (2021), “Integration of the circular economy paradigm under the just and safe operating space narrative – Twelve operational principles based on circularity, sustainability and resilience”, in Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 322, article 129071, pp. 1-13. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Tucci, F., Cecafosso, V., Caruso, A. and Turchetti, G. (2020), Adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici di architetture e città green – Assi strategici, indirizzi, azioni d’intervento per la resilienza dell’ambiente costruito, FrancoAngeli, Milano.

Turino, R. (2010), L’Aquila – Il Progetto C.A.S.E., IUSS Press, Pavia.

UNEP – United Nations Environment Programme (2011), Towards a Green Economy – Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

UN – General Assembly (2015), Transforming our world – The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, document A/RES/70/1. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Verda, M. (ed.) (2015), Energia e geopolitica – Attori e tendenze del prossimo decennio, ISPI, Milano. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 22 September 2022].

Viscuso, S. (2020), La progettazione agile dell’architettura – Riflessioni per un nuovo codice tecnologico per progettare e costruire, LetteraVentidue Edizioni, Siracusa.

Zaffagnini, M. (ed.) (1994), Architettura a misura d’uomo, Pitagora, Bologna.

Matrix of environmental units for the dwelling/work model, shows the relationships between environmental units and living activities and a graph of the Ratio of Elementary Actions and Environmental Units (credit: P. De Joanna, 2022). AGATHÓN 12 | 2022




How to Cite

De Joanna, P., Bronzino, E. and Lusi, V. (2022) “Resilience and circularity in sustainable building design. Integrated tools for pre-intervention assessment”, AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 12(online), pp. 122–135. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/12112022.

Urban forests management. Design-driven technological routes for wood waste valuing

Cyntia Santos Malaguti de Sousa, Tomás Queiroz Ferreira Barata, Caio Dutra Profirio de Souza,...