Ibridazione della professione – Nuove alleanze per un’innovazione infrastrutturale del progetto architettonico

Autori

  • Elodie Nourrigat École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Montpellier (Francia)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69143/2464-9309/1912026

Parole chiave:

innovazione infrastrutturale, ibridazione, progettazione, trasformazione sistemica, riposizionamento professionale

Abstract

Il contributo propone una rilettura dell’innovazione nell’architettura a partire dalle trasformazioni contemporanee che coinvolgono le pratiche professionali, sostenendo che l’attuale crisi nella gestione del progetto e nel posizionamento della professione non derivi da un deficit di progresso tecnologico, bensì dalla frammentazione degli assetti procedurali e decisionali. Attraverso un’analisi sistemica delle trasformazioni normative, digitali e istituzionali la ricerca introduce il concetto di ‘innovazione infrastrutturale’, inteso come riconfigurazione delle strutture cognitive, organizzative e relazionali del progetto. In questa prospettiva le ‘nuove alleanze’ definiscono le condizioni per un approccio ibrido capace di integrare la complessità, promuovere la transdisciplinarità e trasformare le modalità di produzione architettonica di fronte alle sfide socio-ecologiche.

Info sull'articolo

Ricevuto: 28/02/2026; Revisionato: 05/05/2026; Accettato: 10/05/2026

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

##plugins.generic.articleMetricsGraph.articlePageHeading##

Biografia autore

Elodie Nourrigat, École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Montpellier (Francia)

Architetto e Dottore HDR, è Professoressa Ordinaria presso l’École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Montpellier (Francia), dove dirige il Master ‘Métropoles du Sud’. Ricercatrice Associata presso il Lab’URBA e cofondatrice dello studio NBJ Architectes, integra la pratica professionale e la ricerca accademica. Il suo lavoro analizza criticamente le trasformazioni contemporanee dei territori e delle pratiche architettoniche, collocando il progetto al tempo stesso come indagine intellettuale e come atto costruttivo.
E-mail: e.nourrigat@nbj-archi.com

Riferimenti bibliografici

Barosio, M., Boutsen, D., Čeko, A., De Loof, H., De Walsche, J., Gomes, S., Harriss, H., Marcaccio, R., Roth-Čerina, M., Sentieri, C., Sashore, N., Vannucchi, F. and Van Reusel, H. (2024), Architecture’s Afterlife – The multisector impact of an architecture degree, Routledge, London. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.4324/9781003411574 [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Beck, U. (2008), La société du risque – Sur la voie d’une autre modernité, Éditions Flammarion, Paris.

Biau, V. (2020), Les architectes au défi de la ville néolibérale, Editions Parenthèses, Marseille.

Biau, V. and Macaire, E. (2024), “1001 manières d’être architecte”, in education.espazium.ch, 28/10/2024. [Online] Available at: education.espazium.ch/fr/publication-universitaire/1001-manieres-d-etre-architecte [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Biau, V., Macaire, É., Aristide, C., Balti, S., Bouysse-Mesnage, S., Dadour, S., Breton, C., Darrieus, M., Decommer, M., Dujardin, B., Devisme, L., Durand, B., Escar-Otin, N., Flamand, A., Geisler, É., Genyk, I., Hardouin, O., Horsch, B., Hunout, G., Manola, T., Mougey, M., Nordström, M., Ouvrard, P., Pham, F., Proust, S., Roux, J.-M., Sadokh, C., Tribout, S., Vandenbunder, J., Védrine, C., Veillerot, M. and Veillon, O. (2024), Pratiques architecturales émergentes, méconnues ou atypiques et besoins en formation. [Online] Available at: hal.science/hal-04663160v1 [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Bolle de Bal, M. (2003), “Reliance, Déliance, Liance – Émergence de trois notions sociologiques”, in Société, vol. 80, pp. 99-131. [Online] Available at: shs.cairn.info/revue-societes-2003-2-page-99?lang=fr&tab=texte-integral [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Bötticher, K. (1844-1852), Die Tektonik der Hellenen – Die Lehre der tektonischen Kunstformen, Ferdinand Riegel, Potsdam.

Buckminster Fuller, R. (2010), Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth, Lars Müller Publisher, Zurich.

Buckminster Fuller, R. and Applewhite, E.-J (1975), Synergetics – Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, Macmillan, New York.

Dauge, Y. (2004), Métiers de l’architecture et du cadre de vie – Les architectes en peril, Rapport d’information n° 64 (2004-2005), Commission des affaires culturelles, Sénat Français. [Online] Available at: senat.fr/rap/r04-064/r04-064.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 8 May 2026].

Diez, L. (2024), “Conception-réalisation versus architecte-artisan”, in D’architectures, vol. 316, p. 28. [Online] Available at: darchitectures.com/magazine/rubriques/point-de-vue/5716-conception-realisation-versus-architecte-artisan.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013), Speculative Everything – Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, Cambridge-London, MIT Press. [Online] Available at: readings.design/PDF/speculative-everything.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Durand, B. (2023), Fabrication d’une ‘architecture durable’ en France (2000-2010), Doctoral Thesis, Université Paris-Est, France. [Online] Available at: theses.hal.science/tel-04353097 [Accessed 29 March 2026].

European Commission – Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2021), Industry 5.0 – Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, Publications Office of the European Union. [Online] Available at: data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/308407 [Accessed 8 May 2026].

Geels, F. W. (2002), “Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes – A multi-level perspective and a case-study”, in Research Policy, vol. 31, issue 8-9, pp.1257-1274. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Halpern, G. (2020), Tous Centaures! – Eloge de l’Hybridation, Le Pommier, Paris.

Harriss, H., Hyde, R. and Marcaccio, R. (2020), Architects after Architecture – Alternative Pathways for Practice, Routledge, New York.

Hudin, A. and Veran, C. (2012), “Labels, certifications, normes pour l’aménagement durable – L’urgence d’instaurer un langage commun”, in lemoniteur.fr, 14/12/2012. [Online] Available at: lemoniteur.fr/article/labels-certifications-normes-pour-l-amenagement-durable-l-urgence-d-instaurer-un-langage-commun.1468789 [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Jonas, H. (1990), Le principe de responsabilité – Une éthique pour la civilisation technologique, Éditions du Cerf, Paris.

Kirby, D. (2010), “The Future is Now – Diegetic Prototypes and the Role of Popular Films in Generating Real-World Technological Development”, in Social Studies of Science, vol. 40, issue 1, pp. 41-70. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1177/0306312709338325 [Accessed 8 May 2026].

Landes-Rechnungshof Vorarlberg (2003), Prüfbericht über das Büro für Zukunftsfragen, Bregenz. [Online] Available at: lrh-v.at/report/buro-fur-zukunftsfragen?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Latour, B. (2015), Face à Gaïa – Huit conférences sur le Nouveau Régime Climatique, La Découverte, Paris.

Loorbach, D. (2010), “Transition Management for Sustainable Development – A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework”, in Governance | An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 161-183. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Lovelock, J. (2017), La Terre est un être vivant – L’hypothèse Gaïa, Flammarion, Paris.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W. (1972), The Limits to Growth – A report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York.

Morin, E. (2015), Penser global – L’humain et son univers, Éditions Robert Laffont, Paris.

Morin, E. (2007), L’an I de l’ère écologique – La Terre dépend de l’homme qui dépend de la Terre, Tallandier, Paris.

Morin, E. (2005), Introduction à la pensée complexe, Seuil, Paris.

Morin, E. (2004), La Méthode – 6 – Éthique, Seuil, Paris.

Morin, E. (2000), Les sept savoirs nécessaires à l’éducation du futur, Seuil, Paris.

Nourrigat, E. (1999), Guetteur 01 – L’architecture comme prétexte, Diploma in Architecture, École d’Architecture de Montpellier, France.

Nova, N. (2014), Futurs? – La panne des imaginaires technologiques, Les Moutons Électriques, Montélimar.

Piaget, J. (1972), “L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires”, in OCDE (ed.), L’interdisciplinarité – Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche dans les universités, OCDE, Paris, pp. 131-144.

Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1979), La Nouvelle Alliance – Métamorphose de la science, Gallimard, Paris.

Schot, J. and Geels, F-W. (2008), “Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys – Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy”, in Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 20, issue 5, pp 537-554. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651 [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Stacher, S. (2023), Architecture en temps de crise – Stratégies actuelles et historiques pour la conception de ‘mondes nouveaux, Birkhäuser Architecture, Basel.

Tansley, A. G. (1935), “The use and abuse of vegetational concept and terms”, in Ecology | Ecological Society of America, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 284-307. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.2307/1930070 [Accessed 29 March 2026].

Toffler, A. (1970), Future Shock, Random House, New York.

UNDP (2018), Foresight Manual – Empowered Futures for the 2030 Agenda, UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence. [Online] Available at: undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/UNDP_ ForesightManual_2018.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2026].

von Bertalanffy, L. (2012), Théorie générale des systèmes, Dunod, Paris.

A conceptual map of Architects After Architecture shows ‘Architecture’ at the centre, representing its traditional form. Surrounding this core is PLUS, the ambiguous area where practitioners push the discipline’s boundaries from within. ‘Beyond’ signifies those who have departed from architecture entirely to utilise their expertise in other domains (credit: Studio Folder, 2020). AGATHÓN 19 | 2026

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

30-06-2026

Come citare

Nourrigat, E. (2026) «Ibridazione della professione – Nuove alleanze per un’innovazione infrastrutturale del progetto architettonico», AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, 19, pagg. 22–35. doi: 10.69143/2464-9309/1912026.