Connessioni umane. Progettare artefatti interattivi attraverso narrazione e speculazione

Autori

  • Andrea Di Salvo Politecnico di Torino
  • Andrea Arcoraci Politecnico di Torino

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/8242020

Parole chiave:

design dell’interazione, design fiction, design speculativo, esperienza utente, futuro

Abstract

La ricerca in design è oggi alla ricerca di soluzioni che riparino i problemi che il design stesso ha creato, tuttavia, puntare solo sull’attitudine reattiva non è più sufficiente per l’attuale complessità del sistema. Il design ha, infatti, bisogno, di spingersi verso una modalità proattiva, deve saper anticipare, immaginare e offrire futuri possibili e preferibili incentivando l’innovazione sociale. L’articolo si propone quindi di illustrare un approccio di ricerca basato sull’intersezione tra interaction design, design fiction e design speculativo. L’obiettivo della sperimentazione, che adotta la metodologia research through design, è di sollevare nuove prospettive sui comportamenti umani attraverso l’interazione con artefatti e città, facilitando la discussione riguardo gli infiniti modi di pensare al futuro.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

##plugins.generic.articleMetricsGraph.articlePageHeading##

Biografie autore

Andrea Di Salvo, Politecnico di Torino

PhD, è Ricercatore presso il Dipartimento di Architettura e Design dove svolge attività di ricerca prevalentemente nell’ambito dell’Interaction Design, della User Experience, dell’Interazione Uomo-Macchina. È Docente del Corso di Virtual Design nella Laurea magistrale in Design Sistemico.
E-mail: andrea.disalvo@polito.it

Andrea Arcoraci, Politecnico di Torino

Dottorando presso il Dipartimento di Architettura e Design, svolge attività di ricerca prevalentemente nell’ambito dell’Interaction Design, della User Experience, dell’Interazione Uomo-Macchina.
E-mail: andrea.arcoraci@polito.it

Riferimenti bibliografici

Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S. and Koefoed Hansen, L. (2015), “Immodest Proposals – Research Through Design and Knowledge”, in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2093-2102. [Online] Available at: dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2702123.2702400 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Bistagnino, L. (2011), Systemic Design – Design the production and environmental sustainability, Slow Food, Bra.

Blythe, M., Encinas, E., Kaye, J., Avery, M. L., McCabe, R. and Andersen, K. (2018), “Imaginary Design Workbooks: Constructive Criticism and Practical Provocation”, in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 21-26, 2018, Montréal, QC, Canada, paper 233, pp. 1-12. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173807 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Bosch, T. (2012), “Sci-Fi Writer Bruce Sterling Explains the Intriguing New Concept of Design Fiction”, in Slate.com, 02/03/2012. [Online] Available at: slate.com/technology/2012/03/bruce-sterling-on-design-fictions.html [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Coulton, P., Lindley, J. G., Sturdee, M. and Stead, M. (2017), “Design fiction as World Building”, in Proceedings of the 3rd Research through Design Conference 2017, pp. 164-179. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4746964.v1 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013), Speculative Everything – Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

Floridi, L. (ed.) (2015), The Onlife Manifesto – Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, Springer Open. [Online] Available at: www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319040929 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Floridi, L. (2012), “Big Data and Their Epistemological Challenge”, in Philosophy & Technology, vol. 25, pp. 435-437. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s13347-012-0093-4 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Grand, S. and Wiedmer, M. (2010), “Design Fiction – A Method Toolbox for Design Research in a Complex World”, in Durling, D., Bousbaci, R., Chen, L.-L., Gauthier, P., Poldma, T., Roworth-Stokes, S. and Stolterman, E. (eds), Proceedings of the DRS 2010 Conference – Design and Complexity, Montréal, 7 to 9 July, 2020, Université de Montréal, pp. 562-577. [Online] Available at: www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/047.pdf [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Hales, D. (2013), “Design fictions an introduction and provisional taxonomy”, in Digital Creativity, vol. 24, issue 1, pp. 1-10. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.769453 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Kahng, A. B. (2012), “Predicting the future of information technology and society [The Road Ahead]”, in IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 29, issue 6, pp. 101-102. [Online] Available at: ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6497099 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Knutz, E., Markussen, T. and Christensen P. R. (2014), “The Role of Fiction in Experiments within Design, Art & Architecture – Towards a New Typology of Design Fiction”, in Artifact | Journal of Design Practice, vol. III, issue 2, pp. 8.1-8.13. [Online] Available at: www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/ intellect/ajdp/2014/00000003/00000002/art00009?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Lindley, J. and Coulton, P. (2016), “Pushing the limits of design fiction – The case for fictional research papers”, in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 4032-4043. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858446 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Lindley, J. and Coulton, P. (2015), “Back to the future – 10 years of design fiction”, in Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 210-211. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783592 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Lindley, J. and Coulton, P. (2014), “Modelling Design Fiction: what’s the story?”, in StoryStorm Workshop at ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems in 2014, pp. 1-4. [Online] Available at: eprints.lancs.ac.uk/ id/eprint/69587/1/Modelling_Design_Fiction_StoryStorm_Paper.pdf [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Lindley, J., Coulton, P. and Sturdee, M. (2017), “Implications for Adoption”, in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 265-277. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025742 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Lupetti, M. L., Smit, I. and Cila, N. (2018), “Near future cities of things – Addressing dilemmas through design fiction”, in Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 787-800. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240273 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Manzini, E. (2014), “Making Things Happen – Social Innovation and Design”, in Design Issues, vol. 30, issue 1, pp. 57-66. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00248 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Pargman, D., Eriksson, E., Höjer, M., Östling, U. G. and Borges, L. A. (2017), “The (Un)sustainability of Imagined Future Information Societies”, in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 773-785. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025858 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Sterling, B. (2009), “Cover Story Design fiction”, in Interactions, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 20-24. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/1516016.1516021 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Tanenbaum, J., Pufal, M. and Tanenbaum, K. (2016), “The limits of Our Imagination – Design Fiction as a Strategy for Engaging with Dystopian Futures”, in Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computing within Limits, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, article n. 10, pp. 1-9. [Online] Available at: computingwithinlimits.org/2016/papers/a10-tanenbaum.pdf [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Wong, R. Y., Van Wyk, E. and Pierce, J. (2017), “Real-Fictional Entanglements: Using Science Fiction and Design Fiction to Interrogate Sensing Technologies”, in Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 567-579. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064682 [Accessed 22 September 2020].

Zimmerman, J. and Forlizzi, J. (2008), “The role of Design Artifacts in Design Theory Construction”, in Artifact | Journal of Design Practice, vol. II, issue 1, pp. 41-45. [Online] Available at: www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/ intellect/ajdp/2008/00000002/00000001/art00006?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf [Accessed 22 September 2020].

The Brainsurfer project: diagram of the interaction that can be visualized; each sphere corresponds to an experience that can be lived in a way that is superimposed on its own (credit: F. Colagrossi, M. L. Madau, M. E. Migoni, J. C. Montañès and F. J. Vega, 2019). AGATHÓN 08 | 2020

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

27-12-2020

Come citare

Di Salvo, A. e Arcoraci, A. (2020) «Connessioni umane. Progettare artefatti interattivi attraverso narrazione e speculazione», AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, 8(online), pagg. 254–261. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/8242020.