Designing ecology. The organic as a possible paradigm of a sustainable and resilient architecture
Keywords:organic materials, ecological dynamics, sustainability, vernacular architecture, experimental research
The integration of the organic dimension can be a strategy to reduce the impact of architecture on the environment and appears relevant to addressing the climate crisis. Positioning in a wider discussion on the relationship between man and nature, the paper shows how it is possible to broaden the understanding of the ecology of architecture, on the one hand, by looking at how some vernacular building techniques establish a relationship with living organic materials, on the other hand, through advanced architectural experiments that investigate the inhomogeneous nature of wood in order to integrate it into the project. The goal is to propose the inclusion of the organic dimension in architecture not only as a material issue but as a cultural paradigm shift where the building, rather than as an inert artefact, is interpreted as a piece of a broader and more complex ecology.
Article Metrics Graph
Attmann, O. (2010), Green architecture – Advanced technologies and materials, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ferraris, M. (2012), Manifesto del nuovo realismo, Laterza, Bari.
Griffero, T. (2016), Il pensiero dei sensi – Atmosfere ed estetica patica, Guerini Scientifica, Milano.
Hameurya, S. and Lundström, T. (2004), “Contribution of indoor exposed massive wood to a good indoor climate – In situ measurement campaign”, in Building and Environment, n. 36, issue 3, pp. 281-292. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.12.003 [Accessed 11 April 2022].
Harman, G. (2018), Object-oriented Ontology – A new theory of everything, Pelican, London.
Hudert, M. and Pfeiffer, S. (eds) (2019), Rethinking Wood – Future dimensions of timber assembly, Birkhäuser, Berlin. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1515/9783035617061 [Accessed 11 April 2022].
Hutton, J. (2018), Reciprocal landscapes – Tracing materials between New York City and beyond, Routledge, London.
Ibañez, D., Hutton, J. E. and Moe, K. (eds) (2019), Wood Urbanism – From the molecular to the territorial, Actar Publishers.
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022), Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability – Summary for Policymakers, Switzerland. [Online] Available at: reliefweb.int/report/world/climate-change-2022-impacts-adaptation-and-vulnerability [Accessed 13 April 2022].
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021), Sixth Assessment Report, Switzerland. [Online] Available at: ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/12/IPCC-52_decisions-adopted-by-the-Panel.pdf [Accessed 13 April 2022].
Iturbe, E. (2019), “Architecture and the death of carbon modernity”, in Log, n. 47, pp. 10-23.
Kaufmann, H. and Nerdinger, W. (eds) (2011), Building with timber – Paths into the future, Prestel, Munich-London-New York.
Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social – An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ludwig, F. and Hackenbracht, C. (2018), “Baubotanik Tower”, in Myers, W. (ed.), BioDesign – Nature, Science, Creativity, Thames&Hudson, New York, pp. 36-37.
Menges, A., Schwinn, T. and Krieg, O. D. (2016), Advancing wood architecture – A computational approach, Routledge, London.
Moe, K. (2019), “Think Like the Forest – Maximizing the Environmental Impact and Energetics of Building Timber”, in Hudert, M. and Pfeiffer, S. (eds), Rethinking Wood, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 20-29.
Moe, K. (2017), Empire, State & Building, Actar, Barcelona-New York.
Morton, T. (2016), Dark Ecology – For a Logic of Future Coexistence, Columbia University Press, New York.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., Ivanov, V. and Tsang, D. C. W. (2020), Bio-based materials and biotechnologies for eco-efficient construction, Woodhead Publishing, Duxford.
Park Associati and Bollinger + Grohmann (2021), INLEGNO – Cambiare prospettiva per costruire il futuro, LetteraVentidue, Siracusa.
Piesik, S. (ed.) (2017), Habitat – Vernacular architecture for a changing planet, Thames & Hudson, London.
Rocca, A. (2006), Architettura Naturale, 22publishing, Milano.
Rudofsky, B. (1977), The Prodigious Builders – Notes toward a natural history of architecture with special regard to those species that are traditionally neglected or downright ignored, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. [Online] Available at: archive.org/details/prodigiousbuilde00rudo/page/n1/mode/2up [Accessed 13 April 2022].
Rudofsky, B. (1964), Architecture without Architects – A short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture, Doubleday, New York. [Online] Available at: moma.org/documents/moma_catalogue_3459_300062280.pdf [Accessed 13 April 2022].
Sposito, C. and Scalisi, F. (2020), “Ambiente costruito e sostenibilità – Materiali riciclati e Design for Disassembly tra ricerca e buone pratiche | Built environment and sustainability – Recycled materials and Design for Disassembly between research and good practices”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 8, pp. 106-117. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/8102020 [Accessed 13 April 2022].
Sposito, C. and Scalisi, F. (2019), “High-rise timber architecture – An opportunity for the sustainability of the built environment”, in De Giovanni, G. and Scalisi, F. (eds), PRO-Innovation – Process Production Product, Palermo University Press, Palermo, pp. 93-122. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/8102020 [Accessed 13 April 2022].
Taverna, R., Hofer, P., Werner, F., Kaufmann, E. and Thürig, E. (2007), The CO2 Effects of the Swiss Forestry and Timber Industry – Scenarios of future potential for climate-change mitigation, Federal Office for the Environment, Bern.
Wainwright, O. (2021), “Isn’t it good, Swedish plywood – The miraculous eco-town with a 20-storey wooden skyscraper”, in The Guardian, 14/10/2021. [Online] Available at: theguardian.com/artanddesign/2021/oct/14/skelleftea-swedish-plywood-eco-town-20-storey-wooden-skyscraper-worlds-tallest [Accessed 13 April 2022].
Watson, J. (2019), Lo-TEK – Design by Radical Indigenism, Taschen, Colonia.
Yaneva, A. (2017), Five Ways of Making Architecture Political – An Introduction to the Politics of Design Practice, Bloomsbury, London.
How to Cite
This Journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC-BY).
License scheme | Legal code
This License allows anyone to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms
Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
No additional restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Users do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give users all of the permissions necessary for their intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.