Modulating urban dynamics from a climate perspective – In-between spaces and climate neutrality

Authors

  • Fabrizio Tucci ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome (Italy)
  • Paola Altamura ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome (Italy)
  • Maria Michaela Pani ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome (Italy)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/14172023

Keywords:

in-between spaces, public space, climate change, eco-district, decarbonisation

Abstract

This contribution presents the results of a study that interprets in-between spaces as a modular system which structures space, relationships, and urban dynamics from a climate perspective. The aim is to demonstrate the positive contribution that technological-environmental design can offer in the context of redevelopment and new construction of the urban fabric, concerning the ecological performance of the entire urban system, particularly from the perspective of decarbonisation and climate mitigation. Within this research, a methodology for classifying and analysing in-between spaces was developed, as well as a method for evaluating the reduction of climate-altering emissions. The paper compares six case studies that represent the three identified categories of in-between spaces, evaluating them through the criteria of Naturalness, Proximity and Circularity and in relation to the six strategic axes of Green Cities.

 

Article info

Received: 10/09/2023; Revised: 10/10/2023; Accepted: 19/10/2023

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Metrics Graph

Author Biographies

Fabrizio Tucci, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome (Italy)

Full Professor of Architecture Technology, he is the Director of the Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture (PDTA), the Director of the II-level Master’s in environmental Technological Design and Coordinator of the Environmental Technological Design Curriculum of the PDTA PhD Program. With 25 years of experience as a Scientific Director for national and international projects and research, he is the Coordinator of the States General of the Green Economy in Architecture and the International Experts Group of the Green City Network.
E-mail: fabrizio.tucci@uniroma1.it

Paola Altamura, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome (Italy)

Architect and PhD, she is a Researcher at the PDTA Department. A former Research Fellow at ENEA in the Laboratory Resources Valorization, she carries out research and experimentation on the ecological effectiveness of interventions on the built environment with a focus on circularity, resource efficiency and decarbonisation.
E-mail: paola.altamura@uniroma1.it

Maria Michaela Pani, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome (Italy)

Architect and PhD Candidate at the PDTA Department, she holds a Master’s Degree in Valorisation and Enhancement of Small Historical Centres. Her research focuses on the role of in-between spaces from the perspective of city sustainability and strategies aimed at climate neutrality in urban districts.
E-mail: mariamichaela.pani@uniroma1.it

References

Andaloro, B., de Waal, M. and Suurenbroek, F. (2022), “Lo spazio pubblico adattivo – Esplorare la transizione digitale per il benessere sociale e ambientale | Adaptive public spaces – Exploring digital transition for social and environmental benefit”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 12, pp. 68-75. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1262022 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Andaloro, B. (2021), “Il corpo fisico dell’architettura interattiva – Approcci scenario-based e generativo | The body of interactive architecture – Scenario-based and generative approaches”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture Art and Design, vol. 10, pp. 76-83. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1072021 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Angelucci, F. (2023), Il sistema spazio-ambientale urbano – La metaprogettazione tecnologica ambientale degli spazi intermedi urbani | The urban space-environmental system – The environmental technological metadesign of the urban in-between spaces, Altralinea Edizioni, Firenze.

Bauman, Z. (2005), Globalizzazione e Glocalizzazione, Armando Edizioni, Roma.

Bögel, P. M., Upham, P., Shahrokni, H. and Kordas, O. (2021), “What is needed for citizen-centered urban energy transitions – Insights on attitudes towards decentralized energy storage”, in Energy Policy, vol. 149, article 112032, pp. 1-13. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112032 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Carmona, M. (2010), “Contemporary public space – Critique and Classification, Part One – Critique”, in Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, issue 1, pp. 123-148. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/13574800903435651 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

De Capua, A. and Errante, L. (2019), “Interpretare lo spazio pubblico come medium dell’abitare urbano | Interpreting public space as a medium for urban liveability”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 6, pp. 148-161. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/6142019 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Dines, N. and Cattell, V. (2006), Public Spaces, Social Relations and Well-being in East London, The Policy Press, Bristol. [Online] Available at: jrf.org.uk/report/public-spaces-and-social-relations-east-london [Accessed 11 October 2023].

European Commission (2019), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The European Green Deal, document 52019DC0640, 640 final. [Online] Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2001), “Travel and the Built Environment – A Synthesis”, in Transportation Research Record | Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1780, issue 1, pp. 87-114. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3141/1780-10 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Flusty, S. (1997), “Building paranoia”, in Ellin, N. (ed.), Architecture of Fear, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, pp. 47-59.

Franck, K. and Stevens, Q. (eds) (2006), Loose Space – Diversity and Possibility in Urban Life, Routledge, London.

Gehl, J. (2017), Città per le persone, Maggioli Editore, Roma.

Gehl, J. (2011), Life between buildings – Using public space, Island Press, Washington (DC).

Herzog, T. and Steckeweh, C. (2000), StadtWende – Komplexität im Wandel | Trasformazione Urbana – Complessità e cambiamento, Jovis Verlag, Berlin.

Lee, I.-M. and Buchner, D. M. (2008), “The Importance of Walking to Public Health”, in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 40, issue 7, pp. S512-S518. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Losasso, M. (2022), “Crisi interconnesse e complessità del progetto | Interconnected crises and design complexity”, in Techne | Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, vol. 23, pp. 7-9. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.36253/techne-12913 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Malone, K. (2002), “Street life – Youth, culture and competing uses of public space”, in Environment and Urbanization, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 157-168. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400213 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Marrone, P. and Montella, I. (2022), “Edifici e spazi di prossimità per la transizione energetica – Una sperimentazione su limiti e potenzialità delle Comunità Energetiche Rinnovabili nella città costruita”, in Ferrante, T. and Tucci, F. (eds), BASES Benessere Ambiente Sostenibilità Energia Salute – Programmare e progettare nella transizione, FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp. 347-355.

Marston Fitch, J. (1980), La Progettazione Ambientale, Franco Muzzio Editore, Roma.

Moreno, C. (2019), “The 15 minutes-city – For a new chrono-urbanism!”, in moreno-web.net, 29/12/2019. [Online] Available at: moreno-web.net/the-15-minutes-city-for-a-new-chrono-urbanism-pr-carlos-moreno/ [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C. and Pratlong, F. (2021), “Introducing the ‘15-Minute City’ – Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities”, in Smart Cities, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 93-111. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Nalaskowska, S. (2021), “How to bring the city closer to people? Using spatial network analysis to create a 15-minute city”, in Proceedings of European Transport Conference 2021, pp. 1-16. [Online] Available at: researchgate.net/publication/354651826_How_to_bring_the_city_closer_ to_people_Using_spatial_network_analysis_to_create_a_15-minute_city [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Piccinno, G. and Lega, E. (2013), “Spatial Design for New Typologies of Places – In-between Urban Spaces”, in Rogers, B. L. and Sugiyama, A. (eds), Space and Place – Diversity in Reality, Imagination, and Representation, Brill, Leida, pp. 41-49. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1163/9781848881266_005 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Rahmann, H. and Jonas, M. (2011), Urban Voids – The hidden dimension of temporary vacant spaces in rapidly growing cities – Proceedings of the State of Australian Cities National Conference in Melbourne, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp. 1-11. [Online] Available at: suelourbano.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SOAC2011_0229_final.pdf [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Scalisi, F. and Ness, D. (2022), “Simbiosi tra vegetazione e costruito – Un approccio olistico, sistemico e multilivello | Symbiosis of greenery with built form – A holistic, systems, multi-level approach”, in Agathón | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 11, pp. 26-39. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1122022 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Tucci, F. (2023) “Lo spazio intermedio al centro della (meta)progettazione tecnologica ambientale”, in Angelucci, F. (ed.), Il sistema spazio-ambientale urbano – La metaprogettazione tecnologica ambientale degli spazi intermedi urbani | The urban space-environmental system – The environmental technological metadesign of the urban in-between spaces, Altralinea Edizioni, Firenze, pp. 14-23.

Tucci, F. (2018), Costruire e Abitare Green – Approcci, strategie, azioni per una Progettazione Tecnologica Ambientale | Green Building and Dwelling – Approaches, Strategies, Experimentation for an Environmental Technological Design, Altralinea Edizioni, Firenze.

Tucci, F. and Altamura, P. (2023), “Opportunità, indirizzi, strategie di mitigazione climatica attraverso la riduzione delle emissioni nelle città al 2030, verso la neutralità climatica al 2050”, in Tucci F., Cecafosso V., Altamura, P. and Turchetti, G. (eds), Verso la neutralità climatica di architetture e città green – Approcci, indirizzi, strategie, azioni, FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp. 76-113. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.3280/OA-987 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Tucci, F., Baiani, S., Altamura, P. and Cecafosso, V. (2021), “District Circular Transition e progetto tecnologico verso un modello di Circular City | District Circular Transition and technological design towards a Circular City model”, in Techne | Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, vol. 22, pp. 227-239. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.36253/techne-10612 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

UN (2015), Transforming Our World – The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

UNFCCC (2021), Glasgow Climate Pact. [Online] Available at: unfccc.int/documents/310475 [Accessed 11 October 2023].

Karen Blixens Plads (2019) in Copenhagen, designed by Cobe (credit: R. Hjortshøj – COAST). AGATHÓN 14 | 2023

Downloads

Published

31-12-2023

How to Cite

Tucci, F., Altamura, P. and Pani, M. M. (2023) “Modulating urban dynamics from a climate perspective – In-between spaces and climate neutrality”, AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 14, pp. 204–215. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/14172023.